copytight hagpl ieNets on namzezam2 see hagpl ieNets


/\ Humanitarian AGPL License (Hagpl): You are not allowed to use, produce from or design from this or its part, anything contained with the aim to kill, to torture, or without their consent, to cause harm to or to monitor people and any permission beside this restriction is granted here only under the Agpl License!

Notes:

We, the creative class, could embarrass the industries of war by humanitarian licensing, such this humanitarian agpl;
The Humanitarian agpl (hagpl), as any other Humanitarian open source (hos) code, puts the 5th criteria, "No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups", a condition for the 6th one, "No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor" and hence forbids any discrimination between people by the use of such code.
The tongue knife killing case: a non-humanitarian, usual and repeated argument tells that the use of knife is dual, for buttering - a humanitarian one, but also a non humanitarian use to kill people, but the case of (the vehicle) tank having in its specification being better in killing people is not "also humanitarian" as putting butter on the bread. Thus, in developing a humanitarian code from such knife, the tank application would already become forbidden.
Stopping wars cannot be made by constantly adding wars, but by fighting the industry producing its weapons, an industry which must have all unique things under its control, a condition which is fully dependent on any one's creativity, a case which developing under humanitarian code can prevent.
Josef Mengele or Sidney Gottlieb ones, please stop hacking people: Arguments putting the freedom to learn by doing and the add to knowledge above any other values can only be accepted as Pseudo Religious by Agents or Angels of Death, especially nowadays, when in larger areas machines are able to be more competitive than human.
Humanitarian open source can at-least embarrass or become more costly for the NSA in its Unnecessary and Disproportionate habit to Violates International Human Rights Standards.
Dual licensing option: "If you hold the humanitarian values specified above and only when the code contains agpl compatible licensed code, you may use this code under agpl".

At any rate, licensed gpl versus agpl, is anachronism allowing closing open source in servers farms providing dark services. mirror1120




/\ The ieNets - Restructuring to equally owning together with unequally in a constant ratio:

We, the people living and dying on earth, gradually understand that our problems are structural and global and that the corporate structure is aggressive and used as colonial, in already some hundreds years of power accumulation, since its main task is its fewer owners profit maximization as if nothing else matter. This normality is environmental destructive and bad for most of us since it creates exponential growing gaps, machine mystification leading to ignorance and fascism, centralization, machinery unification, segregation and, with the most impact, global monopolization, while making most of us complicit in it and hence this is also addictive. Global corporate became stronger than states, while controlling our law by their lobbyists and dominating for corrupting their most powerful points in democratic, or non democratic, states, for playing their dramatic presentation shows of representation and minimizing our sovereignty, while working or investing in their destruction profit maximization or in volunteering with them in demonstrations or nonprofit organizations, for us being exhausted. crushed and then paved. Lost sovereignty, the drift is over. No more! And so. we get restructuring:.
• When preceding one capital letter in this document, the "ie" prefix refers to the "Integrative Egalitarian" expression.
• ieNets are made for peacefully integrating human and financial capitals, for maybe also creating their political capital structured similarly to water - decentralized, diverse and based on equality in balanced amount groups, between which movements heal, by connecting the egalitarian and oligarch poles in their stable and balanced point being in small and expandable groups, in which equality is maintained, such that the individual human can normally move between their groups, for healing and fruiting their nets, in which human equality is maintained too at any level and while any participant and organization has sovereignty, while all that is lawful. Such water resiliency must not only be while drops own their sea, but also humanitarian. You are invited, beyond identities politic establishing discrimination, while we, they and you should Own & Are this earth. Inclusively is how a new normal is created and with us, or not, your ownership restructuring is important also for us.
Each ieNet is a network of support between individuals and entities gathering or formed within the (5)ieFormation policy and being (1)ieGroups, (2)ieFrame or (3)ieHosts, based on their specific ieAgreement including its motivation, its R, its defaults specification and the ieTerms, which include: (1)ieGroups, (2)ieFrame, (3)ieHosts, (4)AuthenticRepresentation and (5)ieFormationPolicy , where by personal ieAgreement between each and all the rest holding it, such that:
      1.1: All ieOwners are human having equal power in ieGroup and are first buyer collectively deciding about its policies, such as for changes in I in relation to V and which together with their partners being non human, and/or not equal owners, while
      1.2: R, been only once defined, is fixed ratio held by all its ieOwners collective, as their partners together hold 1-R of the ieGroup;         
      1.3: I=R/A=V/G, as
        I is the individual ratio held by each (1.1)ieOwner,
        R is the collective ratio held by all  (1.1)ieOwners, 
        A is the amount of (1.1)ieOwners,
        each ieOwner has value V of the ieGroup valued G and I is her/his portion of the ieGroup in voting power, swapping price and benefits, while holding it;       
      Note that the G increase, as ieOwners are added, while V is unchanged, since the partners earn then, but not the ieOwners by their I, so ieOwners policy should make good deal for both: ieOwners and partners;
      Note that the punishment for breaking the equality or changing R, is multiplied by the amount of ieOwners, as they are all victim and the value of share is the minimum;
      Note also that ieG can be a partner in another ieG, for example: ieOwners of ieG1 are workers, such as developers, of which partners are investors, while ieG1 is partner in ieG2, of which ieOwners are clients;
   2: ieFrame can be owned only by (1.1)ieGroups or (2)ieFrames, while all its voting can only be between the human holding its holders and only such that each voter has only one vote in any of the voting layers, of which the deeper is the more decisive. ieFrame can be unformed yet when hosted in ieHost or  formed as a social business for development or marketing platform or as nonprofit organization, of which ieGroups have no partners, as a fair taxed/donated resources management tool;
   3: ieHost hosts ieFrames in its projects until been formed, where the interactions and roles between (1)ieGroups holding it are set firstly by its ieGroup/s founder/s respecting the law and the ieHost terms, rules and values that must be humanitarian, open and without discrimination. ieHost is build for feeling more safe before formation while enjoying creating industries of life and good products at least for its producers and clients owners:
   4: AuthenticRepresentation: in the organizations above, AuthenticRepresentation are in practice, such that
      4.1: Mutual Vote: Any role being voted by any voter can be fulfilled by that voter and any voter also can suggest any subject to vote about. This is for zero classes between the voters.
      4.2:  Continues vote: Any time any voter can reflect by changing his candidates or the votes he made or by suggestion of new subjects to vote about and with default minimal rate to check defaulted to once a week (1/7 which is 208 times more being responsive than in so self named "democracies" that became more mega showing off and less representing their citizens).
      4.3:  Recompletion: any ieRegulation is attached with its minimal understanding ability which equals the amount of those who know about it and understand their necessities in it divided by the amount of those it is applied upon which and when its understand ability is under its minimum, it is not in effect. This is for making regulation in effect be more understood , allowing public to reflect while avoiding usage of non relevant regulation. The default rate of checking is every month (1/30).
    5: ieFormationPolicy - The ieFormation policy: Any ieAgreement is incompatible with any constantly profit maximization agreement and hence ieGroup can not be formed as corporate and ieHost is any non profit maximization organization, of which one or more projects is used for temporal ieFrame, which eventually are to be formed as a non profit- maximization registered organization, such as social business or non profit organization.

The ieHost:
• Example of ieHost tasks could be supporting by consulting, researching, recommending, connecting, developing and training for ieNets.
• Example of ieHost values:
◦ Sovereignty of the livings as a necessary condition for choosing, creating and reacting with approving, disapproving or abstain and hence for responsibility;
◦ Privacy as a necessary condition for self development based on learning to correct mistakes and hence, for an insight, since intelligent beings are creatures creating sequences, are suppressed when their sequences are cut and are loosing their orientation believed to be found in their community members; and
◦ Equality of rights in small groups, between which individuals mobility in their network of the groups is expected to be accumulative and allowed, accessible and simple as a network service helping these individuals movement and including also the proportional rights, such rights as upon properties and representations of the individuals as a necessary condition for the network resisting its taken over, for example, by means of exhaustion, crushing and rerouting between corruptions and being complicit.
Example of Motivation:
• Owning the sea, while each individual is a drop;
• Turning this global unfaithful governance to become governance working more for the many and less for bribe, instead of heating fear by inward shock and awe doctrines and constantly making shaming and complicit in debt and death, such as in wars and pollution, justified by profit maximization, markets and marketing protection and fascism, for, constantly but secretly, bubbling short term benefits.
• Needing more people owning, for more people being responded and responsible, for what they want. But why do we need such a thing?
◦ AiOwners should be qualified for such AI machine, like people that learn to drive car, since they would be punished for the damage their machine does;
◦ AI cannot, and should not, be responsible autonomy or agency assuming responsibility of its owners. The many AI end users must own it for it working for most of the people, as in the case of car damaging must be reason to punish its owners. Could, and should, a  murdering AI be punished? Are the most of us "useless class"? No. A "useless class" for whom? Shall AI become more complementary with human by working for, and not against, the many, when the many, in our complete variety, are the AI owners and do you remember the claim that the core idea is that AI should be developed and deployed in a way that benefits everyone, not just a select few, and that the "many" – the general public – should have a say in how it's used? Is the current global governing by AI serve distraction and the few? Yes and most human must inspect it firstly.
◦ People should own and inspect AI and never AI shall own and inspect people. As AI is trained on statistical and specific human behaviors, it imitates them in their languages and compete against them and that is being used as a weapon.
▪ AI is risky, it is an agent of war makers, it is made for escaping human responsibility by falsely claiming authority of the knowing all and knowing always the true.
▪ Most of the people already experienced fakeSafe Ai recognition that globally and instantly made wars,financial collapses and immune system poisoning as if it is the people in general being targeted in never being chosen wars. Here are some and not all issues:
• Ai Bias,
• Ai Cybersecurity,
• Ai Privacy Issues,
• Ai Existential Risks
• Ai environment emissions:  AI relies on energy-intensive computations with a significant carbon footprint. Training algorithms on large data sets and running complex models require vast amounts of energy, contributing to increased carbon emissions. One study estimates that training a single natural language processing model emits over 600,000 pounds of carbon dioxide; 
• Introduced in November 2022, the data used to train ChatGPT was initially cut off in 2021. As a result, it was unable to verify whether the information it generated was factual, or provide references. Put bluntly – there was no certainty that it was always correct.
  Nowadays AI is already proven of being bias toward the increasing gaps, wars, poisoning and financial collapse upon the many and hence ai must be tagged irresponsible. One cynical pseudo ethical being army agent tell us that human versus machine are survival competitors and coined that most of us are useless class.Why Autonomous Machines kill are considered agent?  It should be not so, but user experience became louder globally with worsen products made by industries of death and making us complicit in such oligarchs profit maximization as if nothing else matter, when producing wars, as in Gaza, for real estate and oil profits and for increasing control to satisfy reduction of human life and building human densification for the remaining ones and having the rest of earth for them, and all that just by fear and belief alone, which is escalated by autonomic industries that are not transparent for most humans.
Which constraints to AI and machine learning algorithms are needed to prevent AI from becoming a dystopian threat to humanity, such as in Gaza war by Qatargate and covid via mRNA injections risks with 1,251 critical side effects" ordered by the WEF of the global oligarch alliance forces?   
When and if the many own their AI a responsible AI and all autonomous machinery is owned and inspected by addressable people constantly!!!  Only people should govern machine and never machine govern people and never synthesizes empirical studies on responsible AI and the underlying principles.
               Differentiates between principles and governance of AI in a responsible way.
               Analyzes through a critical lens existing studies and uncovers underlying assumptions.
               Defines the notion of responsible AI governance based on the synthesis and critical reflection.
               Develops a research agenda and identifies important areas for future research within the IS domain.
             
Links
      https://www.uctoday.com/unified-communications/ai-for-compliance-risk-or-reward-global-relay/
      https://www.accessnow.org/publication/artificial-genocidal-intelligence-israel-gaza/
      https://ai-frontiers.org/articles/options-for-ai-liability
      https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2022-bias-in-algorithms_en.pdf 
      
       Example of License -
Humanitarian Creative Common License (HCC):

You are not allowed to use, produce from or design from this or its part, anything contains or suggest the aim to kill, to torture, to cause harm to or to monitor people without their consent, while any permission beside this restriction is granted here only under the Creative Common (CC) License!
Notes:
         We, the creative class, could embarrass the industries of war by humanitarian licensing, such this humanitarian license;
         This Humanitarian license puts the open source's 5th criteria, "No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups", a condition for the 6th one, "No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor" and hence forbids any discrimination between people by the use of such code.
         The knife&tank killing case: a non-humanitarian, usual and repeated argument tells that the use of knife is dual, for buttering - a humanitarian one, but also a non humanitarian use to kill people, but the case of (the vehicle) tank having in its specification being better in killing people is not "also humanitarian" as putting butter on the bread. Thus, in developing a humanitarian code from such knife, the tank application would already become forbidden.
         Stopping wars cannot be made by constantly adding wars, but by fighting the industry producing its weapons, an industry which must have all unique tools under its control, a condition which is fully dependent on any one's creativity, a case which developing under humanitarian code can prevent.
         Josef Mengele ones, please stop hacking people: Arguments putting the freedom to learn by doing and the add to knowledge above any other values can only be accepted as Pseudo Religious by Agents or Angels of Death, especially nowadays, when in larger areas machines are able to be more competitive than human.          mirror1115